Border ContractsPublic register

How border system deals are paid for

Governments pay for immigration, passenger-data and airport security systems in a handful of ways. The model shapes who carries the cost, who owns the system, and what a contract needs to say about data and handover. Each entry in the register is filed under one of these models.

State budget (6 entries)

The government pays from its own budget, through a normal procurement. The state usually owns the system from the start and pays the vendor for delivery and maintenance.

Passenger or user fee (13 entries)

Travellers pay a fee, often collected by airlines inside the ticket or at the airport, and part or all of it goes to the vendor to recover its investment and running costs. The share kept by the state and the share paid to the vendor are set in the contract.

Concession or PPP (6 entries)

A private partner finances, builds and runs the system for a fixed period under a public-private partnership or concession, then hands it to the state. Names for this include build-operate-transfer and design-build-finance-maintain-transfer. Payment can come from fees, from the state, or both.

Development bank loan (0 entries)

A development bank lends to the government, which then buys the system. Bank rules on procurement and audit usually apply.

Grant (0 entries)

A donor government or international body pays for the system, often with conditions on how it is bought and used.

Mixed (0 entries)

More than one of the models above, for example state funding for set-up and fees for running costs.

Not published (14 entries)

No official or reliable source states how the deal is paid for.

Questions worth asking of any deal

The register records the answer to each of these where an official or reliable source gives one, and says so when none does.